Govt Exams
The logical flow: evidence (D) → challenge (A) → governmental response (B) → individual role (C).
'Each' is singular (has), and 'teacher' is singular (is). Both subject-verb agreements are incorrect.
'Evasive' (avoiding direct answers) logically explains why credibility was damaged. This fits the negative context.
The passage indicates real-world applications while acknowledging 'scalability concerns and regulatory ambiguity', supporting option B.
Avoid 'reason why...is because' redundancy. Option B eliminates the awkward construction effectively.
'Acerbic' (sharp, bitter in tone) fits the context of causing tension. Other words don't align with negative impact.
The passage emphasizes that companies must 'reassess' policies, indicating the author believes organizations need to address root causes of disengagement.
Chronological order: D (development) → A (constraints) → C (impressed investors) → B (secured funding) maintains logical narrative flow.
Benign (harmless/kind) and malevolent (evil/harmful) are true antonyms. Other pairs are synonyms.
B presents the event, A provides overall impact, C specifies the consequences, D describes the response.