Govt Exams
The author acknowledges 'commendable intent' (positive) while highlighting execution flaws (critical), suggesting cautiously hopeful skepticism.
'Perspicacious' means having keen insight and understanding; discerning is the closest synonym.
Logical progression: B (discovery) → C (origin/context) → A (implications) → D (next steps) maintains coherent narrative structure.
The passage presents both optimistic investment and skeptical doubt, concluding that success 'depends on' consumer adoption and technology—indicating uncertainty and conditionality.
'Each' is singular (has), and 'teacher' is singular (is). Both subject-verb agreements are incorrect.
'Evasive' (avoiding direct answers) logically explains why credibility was damaged. This fits the negative context.
The passage indicates real-world applications while acknowledging 'scalability concerns and regulatory ambiguity', supporting option B.
Avoid 'reason why...is because' redundancy. Option B eliminates the awkward construction effectively.
'Acerbic' (sharp, bitter in tone) fits the context of causing tension. Other words don't align with negative impact.
The passage emphasizes that companies must 'reassess' policies, indicating the author believes organizations need to address root causes of disengagement.