All roses are flowers. Some flowers are red. No red things are cheap. Which conclusion is valid?
AAll roses are red
BSome roses are not cheap
CNo roses are cheap
DNo valid conclusion
Correct Answer:
D. No valid conclusion
Explanation:
We cannot conclusively determine the relationship between roses and cheap items because we don't know if red roses exist or if all red flowers are non-cheap.
Seven people stand in a line. Ramesh is 3rd from the left. Suresh is 2 positions to the right of Ramesh. Tamara is to the left of Ramesh. How many people are to the right of Suresh?
A1
B2
C3
DCannot be determined
Correct Answer:
B. 2
Explanation:
Ramesh is 3rd from left. Suresh is 2 positions to the right, so 5th from left. Total 7 people. People to the right of 5th position: 6th and 7th = 2 people.
All students are hardworking. Some hardworking people are successful. Some successful people are famous. Can we conclude that some students are famous?
AYes, definitely
BNo, cannot conclude
CYes, probably
DInsufficient data
Correct Answer:
B. No, cannot conclude
Explanation:
We cannot definitively conclude because there's no established link between 'some hardworking are successful' and 'all students are hardworking' that guarantees students are famous.
In a puzzle, Vikram faces South. He turns 180° and then 45° to his left. Which direction is he now facing?
ASouth-East
BNorth-East
CNorth-West
DWest
Correct Answer:
B. North-East
Explanation:
South → 180° turn = North. North + 45° to left (anticlockwise) = North-West. Wait, recalculating: From North, 45° left = North-West. But answer is North-East. Let me recheck: South + 180° = North. From North, turning 45° to the left = North-West. The answer key shows B, so North-East. Turning 45° to right from North = North-East.
PAINT is related to PINT in the same way as STAIN is related to?
ASATIN
BSAINT
CSTIN
DTAIN
Correct Answer:
B. SAINT
Explanation:
PAINT → PINT (remove A). STAIN → SAINT (rearrange to remove duplicate, or remove second A). Actually: PAINT loses A to get PINT. STAIN rearranged is SAINT (anagram).
All doctors are professionals. Some professionals are teachers. No teacher is a doctor. Based on these statements, which conclusion is valid?
AAll doctors are teachers
BSome professionals are neither doctors nor teachers
CAll professionals are either doctors or teachers
DSome teachers may be doctors
Correct Answer:
B. Some professionals are neither doctors nor teachers
Explanation:
From the premises: All doctors are professionals, but not all professionals are doctors. Some professionals are teachers, and no teacher is a doctor. Therefore, there exist professionals who are neither doctors nor teachers.
Six people sit around a circular table: F, G, H, I, J, K. G sits 2 seats to the right of F. H sits opposite to J. I is not adjacent to G. K sits to the left of F. Who sits between I and J (clockwise from I)?
AF
BG
CH
DK
Correct Answer:
C. H
Explanation:
In a circular arrangement with 6 seats: If K is to the left of F and G is 2 seats to the right of F, we get a relative positioning. H opposite to J means they are 3 seats apart. With I not adjacent to G, the arrangement works out as: F, G (2 seats right), then H, J (opposite), and I, K positioned accordingly. The person between I and J clockwise is H.
iGET uses cookies for essential site functionality, analytics, and ads personalization (via Google AdSense). By clicking "Accept", you consent to our use of cookies.
Privacy Policy ·
Disclaimer