The passage presents both benefits and concerns, indicating a balanced view of the tension between technological integration and traditional pedagogical approaches.
'Could' expresses possibility about a breakthrough, showing potential future impact. 'Could' is most appropriate for expressing capability/possibility.
Option C maintains parallel structure with three gerunds: cheering, hugging, and dancing. Others mix different grammatical forms.
The passage presents both optimistic investment and skeptical doubt, concluding that success 'depends on' consumer adoption and technology—indicating uncertainty and conditionality.
Logical progression: B (discovery) → C (origin/context) → A (implications) → D (next steps) maintains coherent narrative structure.
'Perspicacious' means having keen insight and understanding; discerning is the closest synonym.
The author acknowledges 'commendable intent' (positive) while highlighting execution flaws (critical), suggesting cautiously hopeful skepticism.
'Impact' is singular (has been researched). 'Evidence' is singular/collective (evidence remains). Only A contains an error in the provided options.
'Revelation' (disclosure) logically connects to whistleblowing and triggering investigations. Other options contradict the context.
Parallel structure requires consistent gerund form: 'reducing...improving...enhancing'. The infinitive 'to enhance' breaks parallelism.
Subjects Asked in Government Job Exams
Boost your selection chances — practice these high-weightage MCQ topics