Govt. Exams
Entrance Exams
M is uncle of N. N is sister of O, so M is also uncle of O. O is father of P, so P is nephew of O's uncle M.
S=5, A=@, F=#, E=3. R=2, A=@, T=5, E=3. F=#, A=@, T=5, E=3. Code = #@53.
Differences: 5-2=3, 10-5=5, 17-10=7, 26-17=9. Pattern: +3, +5, +7, +9, +11. So next = 26+11=37.
Facing North, turn 90° clockwise → facing East. Turn 180° → facing West. Wait, 180° from East is West. Let me recalculate: North+90° clockwise=East, then 180° turn from East = West. Actually facing East after first turn, then 180° means West. So answer should be West, but checking: East-180°=West. Hmm, option shows East as answer, so recheck: North→East→West. The correct direction is West, but if coded differently, East might be marked.
We cannot conclude whether some roses are red. Roses are flowers, and some flowers are red, but we don't know if the red flowers include any roses.
All poets are creative, and no creative person is lazy. By transitivity, no poet is lazy. I follows. II contradicts this, so II doesn't follow.
Some birds are migratory, and all migratory creatures travel long distances. Therefore, some birds (the migratory ones) travel long distances. I follows. II doesn't follow as not all birds are necessarily migratory.
All innovators are risk-takers, but 'some risk-takers are not successful' doesn't tell us which risk-takers. Innovators might be the successful ones. So I doesn't follow. II clearly doesn't follow.
A is 3rd from left. B is 2 positions right of A, so B is at 5th position. C is at one end (either 1st or 8th). If C is 1st, people between = 3 (positions 2,3,4). If C is 8th, people between = 2 (positions 6,7). Most likely C at 1st = 3 people between.
From 'All programmers are tech-savvy' and 'Some tech-savvy people are introverts', we cannot deduce that some programmers are introverts (they could be different tech-savvy people). II is clearly false as introverts are not necessarily programmers.
