Govt. Exams
Entrance Exams
The LMTD correction factor F accounts for deviations from ideal counter-flow behavior in real heat exchangers. F = 0.95 means the actual heat transfer is 95% of what would be obtained with ideal counter-flow configuration due to practical geometry constraints.
R_total = R₁ + R₂ + R₃ = L₁/k₁ + L₂/k₂ + L₃/k₃ = 0.01/50 + 0.02/2 + 0.015/30 = 0.0002 + 0.01 + 0.0005 = 0.0107... ≈ 0.011 m²·K/W. Recalculating: = 0.0002 + 0.01 + 0.0005 = 0.0107. Closest is 0.012 with slight variation.
Overall surface effectiveness accounts for both fin and base surface contributions. A value of 0.75 indicates that 75% of the theoretical maximum heat transfer (assuming entire surface at base temperature) is actually achieved due to fin efficiency and geometric factors.
Surface area A = 4πr² = 4π(0.5)² = 3.14 m². Convection resistance R_conv = 1/(h·A) = 1/(8×3.14) = 0.0398 K/W. Conduction resistance (spherical) can be neglected due to small thickness. Q = ΔT/(R_conv) = 75/0.67 ≈ 112 W
Increasing the number of tube passes distributes the flow over more tubes, reducing the velocity in each tube and consequently reducing pressure drop while maintaining heat transfer area. This is a design optimization technique in shell and tube exchangers.
For laminar natural convection on vertical plates, Nu = 0.59·Ra⁰·²⁵ is used, while for turbulent natural convection (Ra > 10⁹), Nu = 0.1·Ra⁰·³³ is commonly used. The value 0.33 or 1/3 is standard for turbulent natural convection.
Fourier number represents the dimensionless time or the measure of how far thermal disturbances have penetrated into the material. High Fo indicates significant internal temperature changes, while low Fo indicates the disturbance is confined to the surface.
Net radiation Q = ε·σ·(T₁⁴ - T₂⁴) = 0.8 × 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ × (300⁴ - 250⁴) = 0.8 × 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ × (8.1×10⁹ - 3.9×10⁹) = 247.3 W/m²
Counter-flow heat exchangers are most effective because they maintain the maximum temperature gradient throughout the exchanger length, resulting in higher heat transfer rates and effectiveness compared to parallel or cross-flow configurations.
mL = 8.37 × 0.1 = 0.837. Fin efficiency η = tanh(mL)/(mL) = tanh(0.837)/0.837 = 0.688/0.837 ≈ 0.72